8 Oktober 2014, UKM Bangi - The argument of university
ranking once again hits Malaysian atmosphere when The Malay Mail Online has
reported that Malaysian universities are not in top 200 global ranking while Singapore has improved in its ranking.1 This issue is a concern for Malaysians, especially
Lim Kit Siang who has been consistently criticising Malaysian Education System
and recently slammed The Minister of Education due to the failure of restoring
Malaysian Education image to its glory after 5 years.2 UM and UKM were
in the highlight, as these universities were found boycotting from
participating in The Higher Education World University Rankings assessment. Lim
Kit Siang personally does not agree with the decision even though both
administrations have expressed their reasons for boycotting.3 Fahmi
Zainol, President of University Malaya Student Association (PMUM) personally agrees
with these universities’ actions and stated that these universities should rather
be praised.4
UKM HAS ITS PLAN
It is always an honour to know
that UKM was the only Malaysian University that was in the top 20 QS World
University Ranking for university below 50 years Old5 and recently has
increased its position from 269 to 259 in the QS World University Ranking
2014-2015.6 However, as the President of The National University of
Malaysia Students Union (PMUKM), I felt ashamed that UKM did not participate in
the Times Higher Education World Universities Ranking (THE). It appears as such
a student who did not seat for the final exam after struggling for the whole
year, only wasting time and money. The question of being selective in
assessment aroused; normally if you were truly excellent, you will remain excellent
regardless of different assessment.
Is UKM really avoiding this
assessment and do nothing about it? The new Vice-Chancellor of UKM was
appointed on 1st January 2014 as Prof Datuk Noor Azlan Ghazali
replaces Tan Sri Dato’ Wira Prof. Dr. Sharifah Hapsah binti Syed Hasan
Shahabudin.7 From his talk, he was really concerned about the
challenges of maintaining UKM in a realistic way to compete with other
universities globally. As UKM regain Research University and Autonomous
University from The Ministry of Education, UKM is driven to be more self-dependent
instead of government-dependent as such previously. As one of the other top
universities in the world, UKM must generate their own wealth and stop asking for
more funds from the government.
To become one of the top
universities in the world, 6 Key Result Area (KRA) was established and special
department was formed to ensure UKM will follow the track. STRATEGI-UKM which
is directly under the Vice Chancellor was officially launched on 1st
May 2014 to monitor UKM towards it success.8 The 6 KRA are:
- Graduan
Beridentiti Nasional, Berkompeten dan Berdaya Inovasi
- Penyelidikan
dan Inovasi yang Berimpak Tinggi
- Perhubungan
Strategik dan Perkongsian Pintar
- Tenaga
Kerja Kompeten dan Inovatif
- Penjanaan
Kekayaan Strategik dan Intensif
- Prasarana
Ilmu yang Kondusif
This shows UKM willingness to go in
depth to keep the university coop with other top universities. Is this
indicator/6KRA suitable and will contribute for better UKM ranking in the
future? Let’s compare this KRA with the THE methodology in assessing university
rank. The THE was based in true performance and neglecting a methodological
change, they will asset 13 performance indicators that are divided into five
different fields which are 9:
- Teaching: the learning
environment (30%)
- Research: volume, income and reputation (30%)
- Citations: research influence (30%)
- Industry income: innovation (2.5%)
- International outlook:
staff, student and research (7.5%)
From just a quick observation,
the KRA was covering the performance indicator that was made by the THE. This
shows that UKM was in the track and is available to be assessed by THE, thus
UKM should have no problems to get to the top university spot ranking. Why
still boycotting for this year? If the
reason was the limited evaluation period upon establishment of STRATEGIC UKM,
then what happened to the UKM TRANSFORMATION PLAN (2008 – 2018)? According to
the transformation plan, UKM should be in Phase III where “accelerating to be
the leading university of the world” moving to Phase IV in 2018 where UKM will
achieve 100% of its Excellence Indicators in Governance, Leadership, Teaching
& Learning, Academia and Research & Innovation.10 It is not
fair to say that our universities are not doing anything good and did not
create any potential of progress. I urge Lim Kit Siang to praise and support
out local universities especially UKM for its vision towards excellence. Yet,
the question is, “what, how, who and when is the problem?” and why our
universities keep falling?
What is Happening in our University
As stated both in UKM 6KRA and
the THE performance indicator, university’s culture, environment and research
were the main contributors towards the university excellent. Taking the side of
culture and environment of most public universities in Malaysia, the
environment was not helping to most students for them to explore more on variety
of fields. Well, what would be the value of our
university then when the discussions in “jalanan” and “kedai mamak” concepts have
seem to be increasing every year. Students felt that the culture of wisdom is
zero right inside the campus.
There are so many political
interventions inside of our university. I still remember the 1998 great debate
that was conducted in UKM between UMNO VS PAS and yet since then, there was no
more. The appreciation of scholar was bias, only scholars who are in the same
political agenda are being acknowledged. For instance, Dato’ Dr. Haron Din who
was the Deputy Dean in the Islamic Studies Faculty, UKM (1977-1985) was never being
invited to UKM again even though he lives cross by the campus. The value of
knowledge is absolutely zero due to political interventions. Alumni who are in
the opposition were not acknowledged as much as alumni who are observed as
neutral or “the same political view”.
In the area of research, our
university cannot provide the demands. Some of the research needs to be
conducted outside of the campus as universities are unable to provide with the
right equipments. But this situation can either be an advantages or
disadvantages. Then what left is, researchers need to find suitable base
facilities research in order to make the research possible. This situation in
fact will limit the university research output. Besides that, unequal assets in
research studies would occur. Research based on science and technology was
given the privilege compared to studies based on economic, sociology arts which
have also lead to shortage of research publish every year. There are also some
of our academicians who felt that publishing paper is not that important for
his/her career. All of this matter needs to be handled first.
Personally, for what really
happening in the university, the plan cannot be run very well. What will happen
is, some may benefit from it and some other will not, and this situation will
not lead to the university’s achievement in mass scale.
Breakthrough
UKM must participate in THE world
ranking next year for a better evaluation on its performance. STRATEGIC-UKM
must engage with more bodies or individuals in order to achieve the 6KRA and
lead towards excellence. For breakthrough, UKM shall invite personal like Lim
Kit Siang or others for an open engagement regarding the university’s rank and
performance. I believe UKM can be spotted back on the top 200 World University better
than 2006 in which UKM has made at 185 place of the QS-THES World Ranking.
Mustapha Kamil Husen Abdul Kadir
MPP Fakulti Kejuruteraan dan Alam Bina Tahun 3/4
YDP PMUKM Sesi 13/14
::Bersama Mahasiswa Memacu Varsiti::
.jpg)
.jpg)
